Maurice Ravel
heute: 37
gestern: 14
diese Woche: 37
letzte Woche: 319
dieser Monat: 37
letzter Monat: 1145
Total: 44566

United States 62.3%United StatesRepublic Of Korea 2%Republic Of KoreaTaiwan 0.6%TaiwanSwitzerland 0.5%SwitzerlandChile 0.3%ChileColombia 0.1%Colombia
Germany 11.4%GermanyCanada 1.7%CanadaHungary 0.5%HungaryHong Kong 0.4%Hong KongAustria 0.3%AustriaSingapore 0.1%Singapore
Japan 3.2%JapanNetherlands 1.7%NetherlandsBelgium 0.5%BelgiumDenmark 0.4%DenmarkPeru 0.2%PeruTurkey 0.1%Turkey
France 2.4%FranceItaly 1.7%ItalySyrian Arab Republic 0.5%Syrian Arab RepublicPoland 0.4%PolandGreece 0.2%Greece 0.1%
United Kingdom 2.2%United KingdomRussian Federation 1.1%Russian FederationSpain 0.5%SpainAustralia 0.3%AustraliaMexico 0.2%MexicoIsrael 0.1%Israel
recent visitor statistic


User Rating: 5 / 5

Star ActiveStar ActiveStar ActiveStar ActiveStar Active

The original tempo

This Interpretation follows the original tempoadvice: 1/4 = 80 bpm as guideline and mostly the upper limit of the realised Tempo, following at the same time aswell notated tempochanges as tempochanges as part of the interpretation without leaving the overall guideline of the demanded tempo anywhere completly. This seemingly implicitness is noteworthy, since from 30 other inspect Interpretations all are more or less slower than the demanded Tempo. In Average the Interpretations are two Minutes longer. That makes a Tempo  1/4 = 56 bpm which is 30% slower than demanded in the score.

The historic Instrument

Erard-Grandpiano 1873 (realsamples)



0 # lovelyMark H Wilson 2020-03-21 23:58
This is lovely, thank you for posting. I am curious are you the performer or is Ravel? the sound quality seems like it is from an old recording. We've been coming back to this and comparing it with Bertrom Chamayoi, and a recording I have of Ravel. This is faster and interesting in it's clarity of phrasing and slight detached notes that are grouped together in a more interesting way. thanks Mark
Add comment

Security code